The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 19:27, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Performance by club in the Commonwealth of Independent States Cup[edit]

Performance by club in the Commonwealth of Independent States Cup (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

This article was tagged as a proposed deletion, and while the prod tag was not removed the article creator did object to the prod on the article's talk page. I've moved the article here so that the creator can argue their case, however I do believe this article should be deleted because this information is already on the Commonwealth of Independent States Cup page and does not need its own article. -- Atama^chat 01:59, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep and merge This table would be approriate for the main article. --Kannie | talk 02:59, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge, the context is unclear from the article as it is, but that will be fixed by merging it into the article on the competition itself. Lankiveil (talk) 07:25, 12 January 2008 (UTC).[reply]
• eh? do you guys check articles before voting? They were merged long before this nomination, Delete. BanRay 12:06, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, this information was taken from the main article and put into its own article, because the creator of this article believed that the original article was "too crowded" (see the talk page). -- Atama^chat 23:37, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:24, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, duplicate information which does not deserve its own article. --Angelo (talk) 08:42, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - already in the main CIS Cup page. - fchd (talk) 08:55, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Duplicates table in main article, which is where it belongs. Doesn't make the main article "too crowded". Struway2 (talk) 09:05, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - duplicate info. GiantSnowman (talk) 12:57, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.