The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 17:53, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Phillip Haugg[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability and may even be a hoax article. The only source in the article fails verification and the two external links are invalid. This 18 year old "actor, producer and comedian" doesn't even have an imdb page. At The Suite Life on Deck, the actor was credited as appearing in two episodes,[1] but is not actually credited in either episode. A Google search doesn't turn up anything substantial, just pages like this. AussieLegend (✉) 02:26, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"My name is Richard Willians, working in the administrative sector of the Disney Channel, also responsible for the contract as a witness of actors, checking our data, actor Phillip Haugg yes he participated in the series in 2009, in the series The suite life on deck, the episode "twister", season 3, episode 18, code 113, hiring picture in participation in the series, and his second appearance in episode "when in rome", season 1, episode 14, code 113, hiring picture in participation in the series, both roles with little dialogue, actor Phillip Haugg not famous, but has done work on the Disney Channel series between 2009 and 2010. Answering the request of Ralph Martin Gomez verification. Richard Willians." that's what I found about Phillip Haugg, reliable source, sector management disney channel, is just what I got. 03:02, 31 December 2012 (UTC)— Ralphdark (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Delete, even if not a hoax he is surely not (yet) notable for Wikipedia notability criteria. Cavarrone (talk) 17:27, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:19, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:11, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:NACTOR. The only user with objection has since deleted their account, etc, etc. Яεñ99 (talk) 04:51, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.