The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Unencyclopedic, notability concerns. Only has 800 google hits. The sunder king 10:53, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No sources, no refs, no notability. ZouavmanLeZouave 12:37, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This webpage has an entry for this device. In my opinion, I feel that this webpage is a reliable source for this item. Maybe, the spelling of this item needs to be changed to plastuit. --Siva1979Talk to me 12:40, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. At best this is something for Wiktionary. It may exist, but it's not notable. SilkTork 14:42, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Female urination device. The usual word in Dutch is plastuit (article in Dutch [1]), "plastuitje" is the diminutive form. --Targeman 20:25, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No reliable sources. The link provided by Siva1979 above is only a mention in a message board with no references. The link to the Dutch Wikipedia (i.e. Wikipedia itself), is not a reliable source. If sources are found, this short article would be best redirected to Female urination device. ●DanMS • Talk 03:01, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per Targeman. --Alynna 17:45, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.