- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ansh666 08:02, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Progressive talk radio (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Major issues, all content is poorly sourced or very unclear. Either we delete this or someone takes the time to axe ~80% + of the content... Carl Fredrik 💌 📧 14:36, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:37, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:37, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:37, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. While the article needs improvement, it has some sources and discusses a notable topic. Any problems with the article can be dealt with through normal editing. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 18:43, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. It's notable enough to have an article, and the basic framework is OK. It does need work (and I'm doing my part). J. Myrle Fuller (talk) 02:26, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.