The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Panzerfaust; may be spun off per WP:SS when approaching the level of detail of pl:Granatnik PT-100.  Sandstein  16:22, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pt-100[edit]

Pt-100 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Delete no indication that the knock-off in this unreferenced one-line article is notable. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 16:17, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:V, WP:N and WP:RS A one line article which is badly sourced --Numyht (talk) 17:25, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong Delete No reason to have its own page. Put it as a tiny section in the panzer article.The Talking Mac (talk) 18:26, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, or redirect to Panzerfaust (not Panzer). Manifestly notable - the Poles manufactured tens of thousands of these. Pl has a decent article, demonstrating what should be possible here on en. IMHO, this level of detail would give undue weight to this variant if it were to be incorporated into the main Panzerfaust article. --Rlandmann (talk) 23:05, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.