The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:47, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RDX Sports[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is constantly being recreated followed by speedy deletion as promotional. As per example see RDX Inc and RDX Inc.. Article remains excessively promotional without showing notability. Peter Rehse (talk) 11:30, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:26, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:26, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:27, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as there's simply nothing to suggest better applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 04:40, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:10, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - article is heavily promotional and there is not enough coverage in WP:RS to establish its notability. Mwenzangu (talk) 23:56, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.