The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^{talk to me} 18:06, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ramaswamy Jagannathan[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:PROF does not apply. The article was created by a doctoral student of Prof.Jagannathan User:Sameenahmedkhan. None of Prof.Jagannathan's publications used as references in the article has over 20 citations. The claim that Prof.Jagannathan made groundbreaking contribution to the fields mentioned in the article is highly disputed. He has not held any distinguished position or received any major awards according to his cv. — Finemann (talk) 11:42, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —Nsk92 (talk) 13:15, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, Low citability in GScholar and WebOfScience, h-index in low single digits, nothing else indicates passing WP:PROF. Nsk92 (talk) 13:17, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per Nsk92. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:30, 4 August 2011 (UTC).[reply]
Delete per lack of notable mentions. Both Yahoo! and Googles searches showed very little results, the only thing that came to close to mentioning him was Linkedin. SwisterTwister talk 06:41, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:34, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.