The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Vanamonde (Talk) 20:07, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rein Slagmolen[edit]

Rein Slagmolen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject is a window maker (who apparently for most of his career worked in partnership) and the only source in the article is a student thesis about church windows. I can't find even a hint online of Slagmolen being written about in any detail in reliable sources. Existence in itself doesn't make someone notable enough to warrant a Wikipedia article. Sionk (talk) 19:53, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Some scattered coverage in GNewspapers, such as [1] and this [2], which both appear local in nature. Nothing in Google or GScholar. Unsure about this one. Oaktree b (talk) 20:05, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict)As I said in my nomination, existence does not equate to notability. There's no doubt he existed and produced work. Sionk (talk) 22:18, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You have added material, but unfortunately none of it is sourced.WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 02:28, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry. Only moved stuff around. Edited. Added nothing. gidonb (talk) 03:06, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:23, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:HEY. I've added several RSs and slightly expanded the article. Slagmolen undertook significant works throughout Australia and was/is a nationally recognised sculpture and artist. I feel there is enough now to justify the page and meet WP:GNG. Cabrils (talk) 00:47, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.