The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 00:27, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ren Shi Gong Fu[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable martial arts school - advertisement Peter Rehse (talk) 22:22, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 22:22, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:54, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No real results on Google or Baidu to speak of. TLA 3x ♭ → ♮ 02:11, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete: Can't find anything about this topic, even in local newspapers. --180.155.72.174 (talk) 02:30, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
DeleteAt least in English no WP:RS via Google search or in the article. --Jersey92 (talk) 03:51, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete ~~then Redirect to List of Chinese martial arts.~~ While this undoubtedly exists as a Shaolin fighting style, I can't find the significant coverage in reliable independent sources in either English or Chinese necessary to establish notabiity. Philg88 ^♦talk 07:50, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The List is supposed to be of existing articles. Redirect would not be appropriate. I am not so sure that this is a unique style.Peter Rehse (talk) 08:04, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm ... Fair comment, I've amended my !vote accordingly. Taking a cynical view, this is arguably a Shaolin wannabee style rather than anything unique. Philg88 ^♦talk 08:49, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Reads more like an ad. Nothing to show it meets WP:GNG or WP:MANOTE. Mdtemp (talk) 16:25, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.