The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sam Walton (talk) 00:16, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Weekley[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of the BLP does not appear to meet GNG or ANYBIO. Unable to find any references in reliable sources independent of the subject. J04n(talk page) 13:12, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Curro2 (talk) 13:44, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. J04n(talk page) 13:12, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. J04n(talk page) 13:12, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. J04n(talk page) 13:13, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as mentioned, with this clearly even being close to speedy and PROD material, not even enough to suggest minimally better here. SwisterTwister talk 06:03, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as per nom and above editors. Searches did not turn up in-depth coverage. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:45, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.