The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Xoloz (talk) 15:28, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rick Bayan[edit]

Rick Bayan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

This article is moved from CSD to AFD. I think there is some assertion of notability although the validity of that claim remains to be seen. I think the community is best positioned to make that decision. JodyB talk 14:34, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rick Bayan is not more notable than any other internet blogger with a forum, the sources provided are all personal or blog sites besides the Psychology Today article. Is this the sort of irrelevant personas we want included in an encyclopedia, because if it is, I should have an article about myself. I have been mentioned on a few websites, have my own website, and a blog. I also have been published in a few small publications for projects I have worked on and also self-published some pen and paper games. Rick Bayan simply does not meet the criteria for notability, the article itself is an exercise in vanity or at least vicarious living (if written by one of his admirers from his forum), is simply a regurgitation of text from the site and is not in anyway necessary or enriching to this encyclopedia. Baalhammon 15:13, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Caknuck (talk) 15:01, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.