The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:55, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Bast[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable writer. I can find lots of press releases, but no significant independent coverage of the person or any books by him, just some brief mentions in relation to doomsday scenarios. Schazjmd (talk) 15:44, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Schazjmd (talk) 15:44, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 16:03, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Additional sources added Enginez (talk) 10:58, 17 September 2020 (UTC)Enginez[reply]

Delete:Not any significant coverage that I could find. NonsensicalSystem^(err0r?)_(.log) 11:14, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete being brought in to spout finge non-sense by a few publications in the way Mr. Bast was does not constitute passing any notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:09, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.