The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 20:16, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Edward Grant[edit]

Robert Edward Grant (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Vanity page/resume, subject seems to fail the notability guideline (WP:N) Victmich (talk) 23:43, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Sennecaster (Chat) 23:48, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Sennecaster (Chat) 23:48, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Not seeing WP:N here. SkippyKR (talk) 05:18, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. WP:ROTM executive with many interests. The good thing is that neither the sources nor the article make a case as why to why he's notable, so everyone's in agreement. Pilaz (talk) 21:34, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.