The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Ultraman Mebius monsters#Roberger. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:42, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Roberuga[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Most of the article is directly copied from [godzilla.wikia.com/wiki/Roberger]. Also the character itself is not notable enough to merit an article. Suggest merge into article of series, or simply delete. TYelliot | Talk | Contribs 22:03, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:50, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:50, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:51, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect I kind-of enjoy Ultraman, or at least did one series of it, but I can't see secondary sources that provide sufficient notability, and the article would need a rewrite if any turned up. Redirect to List of Ultraman Mebius monsters#Roberger, which already has the bulk of the content. - Bilby (talk) 11:58, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:17, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and redirect to the list of monsters. No sources to WP:verify notability. Shooterwalker (talk) 13:59, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.