The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No sources means no article. You can learn about this actress on IMDB. Shii (tock) 06:41, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rochelle Gadd[edit]

Rochelle Gadd (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Other than these [1] [2], I can't find any evidence of notability, Fails NACTOR & GNG. –Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 17:05, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. –Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 17:08, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. –Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 17:10, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. –Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 17:10, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter123 (converse) @ 14:55, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter123 (negotiate) @ 20:35, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Since no one's commented at all here It may be a better idea to Soft Delete instead of relisting for the third time?.... –Davey2010Talk 16:17, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • She has but we don't generally keep articles on BLPs that are unsourceable, If you've found something I haven't please share it - I'm all for keeping this providing there's sufficient sources. –Davey2010Talk 17:02, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.