- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 10:45, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Rubina Bajwa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Was deprodded with the rationale, "fixed typo", without improvement. Fails both WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. Onel5969 TT me 03:55, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 09:59, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Getting started in the same trade as a relative does not confer notability. There is a strange suggestion on the article Talk page that a lack of available sources is a reason for retaining a Wikipedia biography. My searches are finding little, the best being this piece whose focus is as much on the more famous sister. I see nothing to meet WP:NACTOR or broader biographical notability criteria. AllyD (talk) 10:08, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:26, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:26, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:08, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.