The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of♥♦♣ ♠ 01:01, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Conflict of interest, vanity article. -Nard 23:54, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fictional superhero that appears to be published only on the author's webspace. No third party sources, no real world perspective, no claim to notability other than "popular on deviantart". This one is pretty clear. gnfnrf (talk) 00:35, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete disgusting vanity. JuJube (talk) 03:27, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Mostly delete consensus; lets just say delete. This is none-encyclopediac, and it only talk about personal heros or idols.--FreewayguyMsgUSC 23:00, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Would be speedy-able as A7 if it applied to creative works. – sgeurekat•c 18:39, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.