The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:54, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sand and Foam[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no evidence that this book meets the guidelines of WP:BOOK or WP:GNG. Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:38, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- Danger (talk) 15:13, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. -- Danger (talk) 15:13, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:15, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently, Twinkle hates me. :P Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:18, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - A completely undeveloped microstub. --Kumioko (talk) 14:46, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 00:19, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There's almost nothing here. -- DanielKlotz (talk · contribs) 02:28, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.