The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe deckertalk to me 15:00, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

SbsFoot[edit]

SbsFoot (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any reliable sources that attest to the notability of this company per WP:CORP. References given are for the footballer that they manage, not for the company itself. Contested prod. ... discospinster talk 04:34, 22 June 2011 (UTC)<br\> <br\> Delete - After a lot of searching I found one reference - Transfermarkt - to suggest that Sbsfoot actually exists but nothing to satisfy wp:gng. This company is not notable. MarkDask 10:49, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:29, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:29, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.