The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 00:12, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Security thought leadership[edit]

Security thought leadership (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Appears to be a personal essay rather than an encyclopedia article, runing into WP:OR trouble. Ecoleetage (talk) 19:27, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and since it appears to be an unresolvable neologism. --Several Times (talk) 19:47, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete OR Personal essay Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 20:43, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• DeleteAs per nom. harris 578 (talk) 22:00, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I agree with Doc Strange on this one. I looked up the topic, and tried to find reliable sources. I was only able to find two,[1][2] and both were highly unhelpful. Therefore I conclude a lot of the article is made up of original research. The tone of this essay clearly isn't encyclopedic, and I believe it is safe to say this was meant to be a personal essay. WP:NOT states wikipedia is not for personal essays. I would like to mention a third policy that it violates, which Doc didn't mention. That is WP:V. --SJP (talk) 22:15, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.