The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:28, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SmartMouth[edit]

SmartMouth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article's subject is a brand of mouthwash. The article states that the mouthwash uses novel technology but it is not clear whether this is an advertising claim or good science, even though a reputable medical school and doctor are named. There is a mechanism proposed for the science of attacking bad breath, but it is not clear whether all mouth washes work in this way. The references given are primary sources reporting efficacy tests related to the product; to me this is WP:MILL because all OTC drugs get some kind of testing and it is not evident that these tests are special. I have not been able to find third-party reviews that indicate this product is notable compared to similar products in its class. Blue Rasberry 16:37, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the article of the inventor of this product, Marvin Cohen (dental surgeon), for deletion. Blue Rasberry 16:44, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.