The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Deor (talk) 12:08, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Smell and Bogey and the Magic Carpet[edit]

Smell and Bogey and the Magic Carpet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable book without reliable reviews or coverage in reliable sources. Possible COI as the article's creator appears to be the book's illustrator. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 13:36, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Ascii002Talk Contribs GuestBook 14:06, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Ascii002Talk Contribs GuestBook 14:07, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I can't find anything to show that this book is ultimately notable enough for an article at this point in time. There just isn't any coverage out there. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:58, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Borderline G11... --Randykitty (talk) 11:55, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as not notable. Searches of LexisNexis's news database reveals only the very minor mentions it got in the Coventry Telegraph, which seem to fall short of the "substantial coverage" that WP:GNG contemplates. Searching general academic databases that contain literary reviews, there are no hits. As an aside, there seem to be some close paraphrasing issues with the official book description. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 15:34, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.