The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G5. Both author and deletion nominator were apparent Grawp socks. —Wknight94 (talk) 17:46, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So cash[edit]

So cash (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Does not appear to match the notability guidelines. Skullsplitter Viking (talk) 20:33, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No notability asserted. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 22:03, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:50, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Clubmarx (talk) 00:08, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, neologism and unremarkable ED material. --Pixelface (talk) 00:35, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Over 9000 Times: Completely original research. Not sources. Not notable. ^{XF Law} _{talk at me} 08:30, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - This is a pretty incoherent page, but it looks defamatory of people from New Jersey. AlexTiefling (talk) 15:50, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Pick any random guideline, this article violates it. Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 16:20, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.