The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Cirt (talk) 20:11, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Socket (Quoting Software)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prod contested on the grounds that this product, although newer, is gaining popularity, which, according to the contester, means it is notable. Not so. Delete. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 23:28, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Stuartyeates (talk) 07:46, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 01:38, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:29, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Yet another industry non-specific sales quoting and ordering software as a service with integration to CRM and SFA systems advertising on Wikipedia. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:55, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.