The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^{talk to me} 18:53, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sonoma Sommelier Wine Magazine[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability not established, only refs are links to the magazine's own website. XXX antiuser ^eh? 01:11, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I've Wikified the article, but am unsure about the notability of a publication only a couple of years old. I will leave it to others to express their opinions, and will look for reliable sources. Cullen328 (talk) 01:57, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wine-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The article even seems to go out of its way to point out that this recently-created online magazine intends to remain obscure and non-notable. ~Amatulić (talk) 03:33, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete completely non-notable magazine. Qworty (talk) 08:06, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable publication. Wickedjacob (talk) 02:22, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.