The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 04:47, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
delete Not significant either as an article or even as article content. DGG (talk) 22:51, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I agree with DGG, plus the article gives no context. Also, isn't Discordianism supposed to be either a fictional religion or a parody religion such as the Church of the Subgenius? I'm looking at the template and I'm seeing it treated as a real religion. If it is considered bona fide, then never mind. But being quite familiar with the Principia Discordia myself as a book, in this one article's case, though, I agree there's not much here to hang an article on, whether it's about a fictional concept, a real religion, or a joke. 23skidoo (talk) 16:43, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not significant per DGG. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 21:32, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.