The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Unanimous Keep. Foxy Loxy ^Pounce! 11:34, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

St. Albert Transit[edit]

The organization is credible, but it seems like advertising in my opinion. Most of the information are days of transit and locations to bus stations. Beano (talk) 07:23, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the introduction, but remove the rest. Cosmic Latte (talk) 07:38, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The content does not appear promotional to me. An entire public transport network is a major part of any city's system and easily notable. Sjakkalle (Check!) 10:39, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:25, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:26, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand how you think it's advertising but that would be a clean-up task, in my opinion. DoubleBlue (Talk) 16:17, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Even the nominator says that the "organization is credible". This article is tagged as a stub, which by definition needs to be expanded and improved. -Secondarywaltz (talk) 03:24, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I don't understand why anybody would want to delete this. It is a normal transit article, no different from many, many, others. Peter Horn 17:44, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.