The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 22:39, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Streamray[edit]

Streamray (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is just thinly-veiled spam for the company. Unambiguous advertising. Jethwarp (talk) 15:25, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This article's references prove both notability and verifiability. Wiki editors are just unfairly targeting it because it is an adult-based company.

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:07, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Cams.com fails WP:WEB and Streamray Inc. fails WP:CORP. The traffic ranking doesn't imply notability. StAnselm (talk) 00:38, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Non-notable subsidiary company. Carrite (talk) 00:25, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails WP:CORP. Agree with StAnselm. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 13:30, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.