The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wifione ^Message 04:26, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sugar Mill (cocktail)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This drink -- supposedly created in Nevis in 2009 -- may well be an excellent one. But this not only smell like OR, I cannot find substantial, independent, RS coverage of it and its invention. Tagged for zero refs and for notability since the year of its supposed invention. Epeefleche (talk) 06:46, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:11, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as WP:MADEUP. I can't find any RS coverage for this cocktail. • Gene93k (talk) 15:01, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 00:43, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Obvious delete. No sources. No attempt to establish notability. Get rid of this and move on.Tigerboy1966 (talk) 01:51, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Zero refs, zero indication of wp:notability. Also it calls for a particular brand of rum, so its advertising. North8000 (talk) 21:35, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.