The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 20:44, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Super Vadimka[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD was removed with zero comment by article author. Even beyond the obvious issues with the article content itself (WP:GAMECRUFT, poor English, literal fake sources, etc.), the subject is an entirely non-notable freeware game with absolutely no WP:SIGCOV in WP:RS'es, failing to come even close to meeting WP:GNG or any other threshold for inclusion. Ben · Salvidrim! ✉ 20:14, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Ben · Salvidrim! ✉ 20:14, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nom covers it all. -- ferret (talk) 20:27, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. I will note that the author has been engaged about their preferred contribution field (ROM hacks and fan games), all of which have been deleted, to no response. If this continues, WP:NOTHERE might be in the cards... Axem Titanium (talk) 21:10, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. – Pbrks ^(t • c) 21:24, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Even if sources are found, it would almost need a WP:TNT. When I tried to clean it up earlier, I gave up because a lot of the prose was incomprehensible... Sergecross73 msg me 21:39, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It simply isn't notable. Neocorelight (Talk) 01:09, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete And there are serious WP:IDHT issues with the article creator._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 04:17, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not pass WP:GNG Juggyevil (talk) 13:58, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I don't know where to start with this article. Aside from the creators WP:LISTEN issues, the article would need to be blown up if kept, as noted already above. Spf121188 (talk) 18:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all above; non-notable stuff. Mann Mann (talk) 07:14, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all above fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:18, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.