The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 07:22, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

TapeOnline[edit]

TapeOnline (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This could've very easily been deleted via PROD but I wanted something with a little more weight. My searches found absolutely nothing to even suggest marginal local notability and none of the current sources are outstandingly significant (primary, either by official website or press releases). With no possibility of improving, delete is the only option. SwisterTwister talk 04:23, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:16, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:16, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:16, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Absolutely no indication anywhere online that I can find that this company is significant. -IagoQnsi (talk) 04:01, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.