The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:31, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Aquadolls[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article, referenced almost entirely to the topic's own self-published social media presence, of a band with no strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC. CMJ, the chart on which their single appeared, is not a chart which can fulfill NMUSIC #2, because it's not IFPI-certified — and nothing else here satisfies any other NMUSIC criterion in the absence of any reliable source coverage. The band probably would qualify to keep a properly sourced article, but no criterion in NMUSIC ever entitles a band to keep an article that parks its sourcing entirely on their own Bandcamp and Facebook profiles. Delete, without prejudice against recreation if real media coverage ever starts to materialize. Bearcat (talk) 03:44, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ 05:04, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:40, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:04, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:36, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The coverage of the topic comprises solely of short mentions. Fails WP:GNG. Esquivalience ^t 01:15, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Fails WP:NMUSIC and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:50, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.