The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 17:15, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Cultural Competency Organizational Assessment-360[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This looks like a promotional page for a service with no external notability. No external references are provided. AlexTiefling (talk) 16:01, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The article provides no evidence of notability. And as it appears to be a very specialised software package, it's unlikely that there is any to be found. Maproom (talk) 20:12, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - obscure specialized tool with neither evidence nor assertion of notability, however useful it might be. --Orange Mike | Talk 23:47, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:56, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:56, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:56, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage. Article was created by an SPA with a name similar to the developer, so likely promotional. Dialectric (talk) 15:00, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.