The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 06:50, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The GodFather[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find significant coverage for this this software. Joe Chill (talk) 21:56, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. GameOn (talk) 05:39, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete - There is coverage in Personal Computer World. There is coverage in French, but I am not clear on what this publication is. And it is covered in Ghack which is a technology blog so it's not clear that meets our current criteria for reliable sourcing. If some more reviews or coverage can be turned up, then I'd fall into the keep side. -- Whpq (talk) 15:07, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete Well, the first question I would be asking is, is it notable enough to be included in Wikipedia. If so, the article needs enough inline citations from reliable sources to not only verify the information given in the article but to alsop establish its notability for inclusion on this encylcopedia. From what I can see, I would have to agree with Whpq above. As the article stands right now, does not appear to satisfy Wikipedia's guidelines for inclusion. It may be covered by some sources, but if it is notable, one would imagine that there would be reliable sources able to be used as references to back up the article's ability for inclusion. This means both established notability and verified facts. Until that time, it is not a competent article for a keep.--NiceHotShower (talk) 02:09, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment if deleted, redirect to The Godfather 70.29.209.91 (talk) 04:39, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.