The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 10:38, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Proclamation[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any reliable sources to prove the Wp:NOTABILITY. Searching Google for "Проглашенie 1809" returns nothing. Searching for "Proclamation +Serbia +1809" also returns nothing, and it's similar when searching for "Проглашење +1809 " [1]. Vanjagenije (talk) 10:17, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 10:34, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 10:34, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. For my part, I thoroughly searched the Project Rastko website, including the Ćorović's History of the Serbs [2], but found nothing remotely resembling the said document. The article is completely unreferenced, and fails to even explain what the purported Proclamation was about and why it was important. No such user (talk) 11:36, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:14, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator and No such user. Not even close to passing WP:GNG. Appears to be entirely original research.--Ddcm8991 (talk) 04:10, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I proded it, was erroneously declined. Does not warrant an article whatsoever.--Zoupan 13:25, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Original research, POV, unsourced, block user, etc. 23 editor (talk) 15:01, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Merge -- I have no view on whether or not this is original research, in effect invention. The article does have a source. I do not understand Serbo-Croat, but can make out words that look like archives and Zagreb, which makes me think it is not invention. I fully agree that it does not warrant a WP article; and certainly not one with this title, but it could conveniently be quoted at length in the article for which there is a current merge request. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:12, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.