The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kubigula (talk) 01:04, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Tilter[edit]

The Tilter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

FunkyCanute (talk) 14:04, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's just a prototype of a vehicle that claims it will go into production. Nothing particularly notable. Lack of authoritative sources. FunkyCanute (talk) 17:33, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:22, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Rationale now duly given. FunkyCanute (talk) 17:33, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 19:38, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein  21:07, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I see no reason to delete. There has been balaced reporting from various sources giving valid evaluations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.218.59.93 (talk) 12:37, 3 February 2012 (UTC) 121.218.59.93 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.