The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 19:59, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The state51 Conspiracy[edit]

The state51 Conspiracy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Among the current sources are a reddit post, a google support page, the website for the marketing firm, a blogpost by a violinist, a source that doesn't mention the name except to thank them for a location, an article from a low-quality source describing an album release, and the company's website. I can't find anything searching Google that indicates that the marketing firm meets WP:ORGCRIT, so I propose it be deleted. — Mhawk10 (talk) 04:44, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It also has sources from news and government websites, which indicate high-quality data and notability of company and meets WP:NCORP. I suggest this article should not be deleted. but, paragraphs that refer to low credibility sources should be removed immediately. Sahilaim (talk) 05:10, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.