The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:08, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Today (Gary Allan song)[edit]

Fails wp:music: the only source is a wordpress blog. There's nothing at [1]. -- Jeandré (talk), 2009-07-22t11:38z 11:38, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect until it gets higher on the charts or Keep and yes this article meets WP:MUSIC by charting on a major chart (Billboard). --Caldorwards4 (talk)

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:44, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 14:24, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meets the notability criteria for songs, as it's charted on a major chart, and has been reviewed by The 9513 and Roughstock, both of which are considered reliable as well. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 16:29, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Charted, has reliable sources, don't see any problem with it. Rlendog (talk) 19:15, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since it charted, it should be kept, as said above. I know for sure that it won't be a failure. However, a redirect might be fine. Ryanbstevens (talk) 23:14, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per TenPoundHammer - charted, referenced, and not a stub CloversMallRat (talk) 23:24, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
wp:v: "any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source using an inline citation." The 2 new refs are also blogs, one of which doesn't even have a copy editor to fix spelling mistakes. The genre chart is not referenced, and there's no mention of a major chart. -- Jeandré (talk), 2009-07-25t15:29z

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.