The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 17:40, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Troy Lulashnyk[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough coverage in reliable sources to verify or sustain an article. Fails general notability and there is no inherent notability for any of his positions. Only material are short bios from the embassy, some notices of appointment and a couple passing mentions. Jbh (talk) 13:13, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because it is not a simple copy of other sources, it is well written and relies on various sources (see external links. The article is compiled in a different form, added with sources and links. The subject is a important person e.g. an influential ambassador from Canada in a war troubled Ukraine. If necessary, don't remove but help to improve it. I have put already a lot of work to find all the informations about this person, to translate and compile them into a new article for Wiki. --Stonepillar (talk) 07:17, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia does not have any rule that ambassadors or other diplomats are automatically entitled to articles on here just because they exist — a diplomat has to earn inclusion by being the subject of coverage in reliable sources. But that's completely failed to be demonstrated here; this article relies almost entirely on primary sources like DFAIT's own website and his own alma mater's self-posted list of its own notable alumni. A properly sourced article would certainly be allowed to stay — but "properly sourced" does not describe this article in its current form. Delete, without prejudice against future recreation if and when real sourcing can be provided. Bearcat (talk) 15:44, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Ambassador of a major country to two more relatively major countries. I believe that qualifies per WP:COMMONSENSE. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:33, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BIO isn't met. LibStar (talk) 13:50, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Ambassadors are not inherently notable, and are not politicians. Therefore, they must satisfy the requirements laid out at WP:GNG. Tarc (talk) 13:12, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
delete ambassadors are not inherently notable, and this one does not demonstrate WP:BIO being met. LibStar (talk) 13:50, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG and Ambassdors are not inherently notable and are not Politicians.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 09:38, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.