The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Chaser (talk) 00:48, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

TwiGIS[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see what makes this software notable, I don't see significant coverage. Mvqr (talk) 13:51, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete: Non notable. ― Itcouldbepossible^Talk 13:55, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I think it's sufficiently notable to avoid a speedy delete for notability. Not sure about regular AfD yet. PianoDan (talk) 17:12, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:12, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Understand. Should I add more references, scholar citations, etc? VMwiki (talk) 14:16, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Have a look at WP:NSOFT. That's the standard the page would need to hit. PianoDan (talk) 17:12, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Would a redirect to List of geographic information systems software be valid? I was going to look at the number of views this gets and realized the article was created today! – The Grid (talk) 14:20, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:41, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notable enough for me. Quite widely used in Central Europe. – CADadm (talk) 17:53, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but certainly borderline. One suggestion would be to evolve this into an article on both the software and the developing company, Arkance Systems and its CAD Studio predecessor. I find a few more sources for the company, although many tend to be non-English. That would not disqualify, but I am not fluent enough in those languages to judge if they are independent. The current lists of bullets lifted from product ads would need to be improved, at least written into prose. W Nowicki (talk) 23:19, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I can't find reliable sources, and no one has provided them so far. MarioGom (talk) 09:33, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Known in Hungary. There are articles on less notable products here... – User:kovacslace 8:53, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
Probably Keep. The "Features" sec needs sources or should be cut, but the rest of the article seems fine. Caleb Stanford (talk) 06:13, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.