The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:23, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Verah Falls[edit]

Verah Falls (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable per WP:BAND, no significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources. Proposed deletion contested by creator. Gurt Posh (talk) 11:31, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Gurt Posh (talk) 11:33, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Added References Jackiephil (talk} 11:36, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Added some 3rd party ref's - I'd say the tag can now be removedThat might be enough Nikthestoned 11:54, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Everything from this band is 100% legitimate. Blkheart Group can confirm — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.75.77.68 (talk) 12:19, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is not about the band being legitimate. This is about the band meeting Wikipedias notability guidelines Nikthestoned 13:36, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:40, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

---

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:50, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

---

• Delete Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources, highwire daze is just them talking about themselves. duffbeerforme (talk) 03:32, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep – per the small amount of third-party coverage, including the magazine HighWire Daze which chose to publish an interview with the band. (It is not at the level of press-release-type material, in other words.) Thanks are due to Nikthestoned for adding the references. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 18:07, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.