The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:52, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Veroveraar[edit]

Veroveraar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:DICTIONARY - simply includes the "definition" ([1]) and then an unverifiable statement. The "references" cited appear to be fake/nonexistant, and the page author himself seems to claim that he "is" Mr. van der Veen -- right, cause people are living past their "death dates" now. WP:HOAX, even if so no WP:RS for rather controversial-esque statements: "1,000 members", "many intellectuals as members", etc, etc. Theopolisme 11:09, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete- almost certainly a hoax or non-notable. Ducknish (talk) 18:25, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:26, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:26, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.