The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:38, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vigilante, Ho![edit]

Vigilante, Ho! (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can find no independent reliable that cover this topic. Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not requires that articles about websites should go beyond their content and nature and give an encyclopaedic treatment which covers their achievements, impact and significance. Without any independent verification from reliable sources such an encyclopaedic treatment will not be possible for this topic. Coverage by independent reliable sources is also a requirement of both the general notability guideline and the specific guideline for web content. Guest9999 (talk) 00:45, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. -- Hiding T 11:45, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this webcomic. Joe Chill (talk) 19:49, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete no reliable whatsinames. Even the link in the article is dead. Crafty (talk) 20:33, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.