The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Big Dom 10:48, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

VisuMap[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insufficient secondary source coverage. TYelliot | Talk | Contribs 18:55, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, false scholar/book hits on a mathematics project with the same name from the 1980's and another from the 1950's. Directory listings, press releases out there in force. All the SEO may be hiding legimate thrid party sources, but I could not locate anything WP:RS. I would expect some reviews or something for software this far into release. Kuru (talk) 19:47, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:15, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 11:23, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment from the author of VisuMap: VisuMap is currently the only commercial software that supports the new multidimension scaling algorithm called "relational perspective map". To find research oriented references relating to VisuMap, I would suggest to use the search pattern ("relational perspective map" -v3.2.854) on google. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JamesXinzhiLi (talk • contribs) 21:06, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no 3rd party refs to establish notability of this software; created by an SPA so probable spam.Dialectric Dialectric (talk) 01:48, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.