The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:00, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vortekz[edit]

Vortekz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Tagged for speedy deletion by 198.138.41.54, with this message: non-notable indy wrestler; if for some reason this page does not qualify for speedy deletion, could somebody please put it up for afd? I can't because I don't have an account and don't wish to make one. Thank you. I'm not sure it is speedyable, so I'm bringing it here as asked. No opinion from me. – Qxz 04:25, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete- Unless it gets some sources and a good cleanup. --Theshoestore 04:32, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. No sources, smells faintly of a hoax. Realkyhick 06:47, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak delete - not a hoax [1] but nothing to indicate he's achieved any more than any other pro wrestler. - Iridescenti (talk to me!) 19:13, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete promo/fancruft. Wile E. Heresiarch 01:00, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.