The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 23:20, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wake Up Project[edit]

Non-notable. None of the "references" are reliable sources; there is no indication that the content has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself. Tan | 39 16:15, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | ^Talk 16:30, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 18:08, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello user how are you doing? I hope well. I fixed my references but I'm not sure of what you mean by " there is no indication that the content has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself."?

could you please explain, Thank you. --Marie SM (talk) 17:19, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I can't see any notability. 1 hit on gnews about this project. First 50 ghits didn't turn up any reliable sources. Niteshift36 (talk) 06:54, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Zero reliable sources. Unlikely to show any notability whatsoever.--Unionhawk ^Talk ^E-mail 21:12, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.