The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 00:14, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Whapp[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: Fails WP:PRODUCT Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 08:40, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: An unreferenced article for a term which appears to have been used in conversation by the WP:SPA article creator. His claimed precedence is dubious, given this. There are other uses of the term, but as it stands this is essentially trivial, dubious and unreferenced. AllyD (talk) 10:02, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Whatsapp is notable, but this neologism of an alternate name is not. Only Urban Dictionary entry (linked above). 野狼院ひさし u/t/c 10:18, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per WP:A11, no credible claim of significance. —Nizolan ^(talk) 10:43, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: neologism with nothing to substantiate that it has seen any widespread use. Drchriswilliams (talk) 11:49, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:54, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.