- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 10:04, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Whatfix (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The awards are uniformly for being a new and promising product, which is the press relations equivalent of Not yet notable. Everything else is just a notice of funding, DGG ( talk ) 17:07, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:00, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:00, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as simply too soon, there's coverage and information but that's expected for a 3 year old company and there, aside from that, is nothing else convincing. SwisterTwister talk 19:11, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 19:11, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 19:11, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.