The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Davewild 19:32, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
NN Internet security cite, now defunct, with virtually no press and no sourcing. Written like an advert. --- tqbf 18:35, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Summary of English press hits:
One sentence in eWeek in 2005 in an article about a security hole they didn't find
An unreachable page at Federal Computer Weekly pointing to an interview with Elonka on the site
Two sentences in the SF Chronicle blog, after Whitedust accused Wal-Mart of modding their WP page
I report, you decide! --- tqbf 18:38, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no longer notable, even if it was once. Xymmax (talk) 00:00, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and also Xymmax. Greswik 18:21, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.