The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Or nomination withdrawn, take your pick (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:18, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ximena Valero[edit]

Ximena Valero (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Article asserts notability but does not provide sufficient evidence of it. -- Gmatsuda (talk) 19:27, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:27, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:28, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. A Google News Archive search shows clear notability. I've put references to some of those sources into the article. Phil Bridger (talk) 13:20, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - thanks to User:Phil Bridger for the references establishing notability -- Whpq (talk) 17:13, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: My thanks also. Consider this AfD withdrawn. -- Gmatsuda (talk) 17:27, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.